Definition of Holy: The Contribution of Mental Health to Defining it Correctly

I recently completed a book titled, Mental Health for Everyone, that is one part of what will be two parts to my post-graduate degrees including a Ph.D., where the central thesis will be on the definition of holy.  Fortunately, one of advisers for my first thesis paper noticed that my work on definition of holy originally had two papers inside of one paper.  As a result, I wrote my book on mental health since it is really my method for approaching the definition of holy.

I am excited to announce that my book on mental health is now officially published as of October 27, 2015.  It is on sites like Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble.

The link for Amazon.com is:

http://www.amazon.com/Mental-Health-Everyone-Making-Choices-ebook/dp/B017ADOLBS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1447991414&sr=8-1&keywords=mental+health+for+everyone

The link for Barnes and Noble is:

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/mental-health-for-everyone-jon-westlund/1122880720?ean=9781498438858

If either link does not work for you, then use either my full name or the full title or both together.

You can also see a video on the book on youtube at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC5XDFly3GA


If you need to, then copy these links into your browser.  I am not convinced that they will work otherwise.


The key to a successful definition of holy and blessed is the use of the principles that the mind uses to successfully reach decisions on things in our world.  These principles of teaching, coaching, schooling, and educating are the method that I use in solving the differences over the meaning of holy as it is found in the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Scriptures.  There is truly one definition for it, not the many available on the internet!

My next project will be to write another version of this book on mental health and my method that will fill in the all the footnotes that formed the foundation for my published book.  That version will be what I submit for my project for my S.T.M. (Masters of Sacred Theology).  I can't wait until it too is complete.

The following 2 years I hope to devote to the meaning of blessed and holy.  Please pray that I might even finish my footnoted version by this coming Spring and then devote myself on THE big project - the definitions of blessed and holy!  That wish or goal is a stretch, but I would love it if it happened that way.

For now, I will let you know what you are looking for as in a definition of blessed and holy with further proof coming in the future. Blessed consists of an exhaustive set of wonderful things.  Holy consists of the the fullness of these things.  These definitions are a bit abstract, but if you read further I fill the details in more fully.

May God richly bless you with being mentally healthy and even more with being blessed and holy!


In Christ,

Jon

Definition of Blessed and Holy: Comprehension Scores on my Blogs over Time

Yesterday I did some teaching in our public schools.  While I was doing that I happened across a great tool for scoring my post or entry values.  It is a method of scoring comprehension before and after certain times.  I am going to score my entries for this blog and previously by decade leading up to August and September 2014.  That is when my comprehension scores again jumped noticeably in a decade.

1. In 1984, I had no idea what the definition of holy was nor how it applied to my understanding of God.  I found the word to be without either clarity (what Pastors were saying) and without real meaning because the word flew over my head or over the cuckoo's nest perhaps.  I would give myself a 1 out of 4 for my score during this time - since I at least knew it had no clarity and no meaning for me.  I wasn't oblivious to that fact.  
2. In approximately 1994, the beginning of my first decade of real work on the definition of holy (I really was only working on it and not blessed regularly), I realized that the traditional definition of holy needed to be questioned.  I learned this from Dr. Daniel Payton Fuller at Fuller Theological Seminary.  His own proposal at that time had ties to the meaning of "worth".  What I learned most at the time was that there was the threat of an error here and an opportunity for correction from Scripture.  Dr. Fuller, though his own definition was not a great substitute, at least made me aware of a different SWOT analysis - strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Beginning with 1994, I would get a 2 out of 4 score due to moving up to a specific awareness of searching the Scriptures and going beyond the translation in English in front of me.
3. In November 2004, the beginning of my second decade of definitive work on the definition of holy, I realized the usefulness of the clarity given to the meaning of holy by the use of Eugene Nida's TEAR or semantic domain analysis in a more simplified form.  The problem was that I did not also tie to this the aspect of the meaning level from his dynamic equivalence translation theory.  So I missed out on an opportunity to move up to a higher score.  The two major developments now was by better knowledge of both a traditional definition ("set apart") and a classical definition ("morally whole").  So I would give myself a 3 out of 4 on most of what appears in my blog.  It is clarifying in distinguishing two major candidates for defining holy naturally and Scripturally. 
4. In September 2014, I completed my first manuscript for Mental Health for Everbody: A Field Guide (the title at that time).  Since that time, using the pictures or diagrams in that book I was able to figure out that blessed better fit the classical definition for holy and that holy fit with a more meaningful understanding of levels - 1/4 full, 1/2 full, 3/4 full, 4/4 full.  The kind of holy being defined by holy fit with the 4/4 idea.  So now I can score myself as barely inside 4/4 - maybe a 4-.  After I finish my work on mental health, I may achieve a 4.  After that and with the completion of a paper specifically on the definitions of blessed and holy in the effort to earn a full Ph.D., then I could maybe get a 4+.  The point is that there is always a little more to do in the next race you run. 

How well I can persuade others is not yet part of this score. This only scores how well I am persuaded myself.  It is my self-score.  That is a great beginning but it is not the ending.

Feedback like scores in seminary will come later, as I work on getting my ideas out there and before professors.  I am persuaded, though, that the definition I have arrived at is the one that in essence will stick with me for the long haul.

That fact is what will make my Ph.D. work so worth pursuing further. Having a good idea when you start a race of where you are going is a good thing and not a bad thing. Take care.


Sincerely,

Jon